-----Original Message----- From: "Marc G. Fournier"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 19/09/05 16:56:23 To: "Tom Lane"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Magnus Hagander"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andreas Pflug"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta2 Wrap Up ...
> +1 on reverting them back then ... and on > a quick beta3 (ie. by end of week?) +1 from me as well. /D -----Unmodified Original Message----- On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is there a reason the old/new can't be aliaseed to each other, instead of >> the old just being removed? > > Any change like that would require another initdb. If we were going to > force another initdb, my vote would be to revert these functions to > where they were in beta1. It was a mistake to change them in such a > hurry. +1 on reverting them back then ... and on a quick beta3 (ie. by end of week?) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
