On Mon, 2005-19-09 at 10:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Any change like that would require another initdb. If we were going to > force another initdb, my vote would be to revert these functions to > where they were in beta1.
What purpose would that serve? About the only thing purpose I can see is to avoid the API compatibility break for pg_cancel_backend() -- do people actually consider that a major issue? At any rate, I don't see any reason to revert the other changes (i.e. those other than pg_cancel_backend()). -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
