On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
I have a connection that is created with "prepareThreshold=1" in the
connection string. I use a prepared statement that I fill with
addbatch() and that I execute with executeBatch() (for full source: see
"application.java" attachment).
LOG: statement: PREPARE S_2 AS update prototype.customers set title=
$1 , defaultcurrency=$2, defaulttermsofdelivery=$3 ,
defaulttermsofpayment=$4 where customernumber=$5
LOG: statement: <BIND>
LOG: statement: EXECUTE <unnamed> [PREPARE: update
prototype.customers set title=$1 , defaultcurrency=$2, defaultter
msofdelivery=$3, defaulttermsofpayment=$4 where customernumber=$5]
LOG: duration: 773.841 ms
LOG: statement: <BIND>
LOG: statement: EXECUTE <unnamed> [PREPARE: update
prototype.customers set title=$1 , defaultcurrency=$2, defaultter
msofdelivery=$3, defaulttermsofpayment=$4 where customernumber=$5]
LOG: duration: 377.981 ms
Does this output mean that the prepared statement with the name "S_2" is
not used in the following 2 EXECUTE statements and that therefor each
execute statement is planned again?
No, this actually looks like a bug in the server side logging. The JDBC
driver issues:
FE=> Parse(stmt=S_1,query="INSERT INTO tt VALUES ($1)",oids={23})
FE=> Bind(stmt=S_1,portal=null,$1=<1>)
FE=> Describe(portal=null)
FE=> Execute(portal=null,limit=1)
FE=> Bind(stmt=S_1,portal=null,$1=<2>)
FE=> Describe(portal=null)
FE=> Execute(portal=null,limit=1)
FE=> Sync
I assume the server side logging code is getting confused because it uses
a named statement, but the unnamed portal.
Kris Jurka
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
