'k, moved it all into OLD as well ... haven't removed anything until more opt in on this ... I do agree that if you really want that old, you can build from scratch, but I'm also not the one that went to the trouble of building the binaries :)


On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Magnus Hagander wrote:

Someone suggested earlier that we should drop the binaries for
nonsupported versions completely from the ftp site. Thoughts on this?

If not, they should at least go into OLD as well. But personally, I'm
for dropping them completely. If you're on something that old (heck, we
have 7.0 binaries..), you can still build from source.

Speaking of which, any reason not to drop the 8.1 beta win32 binaries?

//Magnus


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:31 PM
To: Robert Treat
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tom Lane; Andrew Dunstan
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases


Done, as well as moved all but the last two of each version after ...


On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Robert Treat wrote:

On Wednesday 30 November 2005 11:40, Tom Lane wrote:
Personally I expect to keep supporting 7.3 for a long
while, because
Red Hat pays me to ;-) ... and the EOL date for RHEL3 is a
long way away yet.
The PG community may stop bothering with 7.3 releases
before that.
But I think Marc and Bruce figure "as long as the patches
are in our
CVS we may as well put out a release".


Yeah, thats one of the reasons I am skeptical about having official
policies on this type of thing.  If Sun decided they wanted to
maintain 7.2 and were going to dedicate developers and
testing for it,
would we really turn that away?  OK, I don't really want to
have this
discussion again, but as of now I think we are all agreed
that 7.2 is unsupported.

We hashed all this out in the pghackers list back in August, but I
agree there ought to be something about it on the website.


We've been kicking it around but haven't moved much on this...

Marc, can you move the 7.2 branches in the FTP under the
OLD directory?
http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/

We need to do the same with 7.2 documentation, moving them into the
Manual Archive
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/archive.html.
We can also change the caption on the main documentation
page to note
these are manuals for the current supported versions.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services
(http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Yahoo!: yscrappy
 ICQ: 7615664

---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match



----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to