On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: > Andrew, > > >How fine-grained do we want to get on namespaces? I'd be slightly more > >inclined to have pg_info or maybe pg_utils as a place to stash not only > >extra system views but other utility stuff that we want to ship but is > >essentially droppable. > > AFAIK, none of the contributors to newsysviews has any attachment to any > particular name. I'd personally prefer to go with your suggestion of a > more generic schema name.
Agreed. pg_info or pg_util sound good. Since there's a fairly large number of views I don't know if it's worth having both pg_info and pg_util. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
