Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > Structure for the human-consumable output or for something that would be > > machine-parsed? ISTM it would be best to keep the current output as-is, > > and provide some other means for producing machine-friendly output, > > presumably in a table format. > > How about (well-formed) XML format?
A friend developed a patch for this. He offered to post it but I don't think there was any reaction at all. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
