Tom Lane wrote:
> "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Obviously it matches your expectation.
>
> Hm? I don't see any improvement there:
>
> > --Before patch --
> > real 0m1.149s
> > real 0m1.121s
> > real 0m1.128s
>
> > -- After patch --
> > real 0m1.275s
> > real 0m4.063s
> > real 0m1.259s
The report is incomplete. I need three outputs:
stats off
stats on
stats on, patched
He only reported two sets of results.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
