On Thursday 13 July 2006 15:39, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Aside from obviously the big issue of who maintains all the pgfoundry
> >>> stuff, I also think that the PostgreSQL family would benefit from a
> >>> distribution that is more "and the kitchen sink" style. I do not know
> >>> exactly if Bizgres could be considered just that? Or maybe it could get
> >>> promoted to be that?
> >>
> >> Lukas, that is what www.mammothpostgresql.org is :)
> >
> > Then *it* needs to be promoted more, since this is actually the first
> > I'd heard of it :(
>
> Were trying man :) I have people building for most major distributions
> at this point. We should have FreeBSD soon, as well as MacOSX.
>
I believe it was Lukas who mentioned elsewhere, this is not a vendor nuetral
project. I actually am already working on a adding a list of os/package
options to the download page based on other feedback, are people comfortable
allowing mammothpostgresql to go on that list? (I wouldn't be mainly because
I don't see a clear distinction between it and things like mammoth
replicator)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
