On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:24:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > After some reflection it seems that there is only one case where removal > of a needed include file would not lead to a compiler error or warning, > assuming gcc with ordinary -W settings (notably -Wmissing-prototypes). > That case is exactly what Kris found: removal of a #define that is > tested via #ifdef or #if defined(). (Can anyone think of other cases?)
My off-the-top-of-my-head solution would be a script that would pass each file through "gcc -E" (the preprocessor), and compare before and after rearrangement. You'd have to ignore the effects of included header files, but it would pick up the cases where a block of code that was previously included no longer is. Or if a macro is expanded differently... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
