Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
PLRuby is written in C.
Specifically on the matter of PL/Ruby -- and if you're trying to be such
an advocate about it, you should at least spell it right -- I have
never seen the author particularly active within this community, so I
have my doubts whether the development processes will integrate well.
In fact, shouldn't the inclusion request come from the author in the
first place?
That is a good point. However in this case, it was CMD that worked with
the Author to change the license, specifically for this case. I don't
think the author really had any intent of submitting it until we
approached him.
From a personal perspective, I do not care if we include PL/Ruby. I
don't use Ruby. I am a Python guy. However I know a lot of Ruby folk
that use PostgreSQL. This would be a good way to improve the native Ruby
support for PostgreSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
