> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory Stark
> Sent: 18 July 2006 19:36
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] Progress bar updates
>
>
> For a first cut this "data structure" could just be a float
> between 0 and 1.
> Or perhaps it should be two integers, a "current" and an
> "estimated final".
> That would let the client do more intelligent things when the
> estimates change
> for the length of the whole job.
Hi Greg,
I would vote for the latter so that we could give more meaningful
feedback - for example, when vacuuming you might give a scale of 0 to
<num tables>. In cases such as COPY where you mightn't have any idea of
an upper bound, then a simple heartbeat could be supplied so at least
the client could count rows (or 100's of rows) processed or whatever.
It would certainly allow us to present a nicer user experience in
pgAdmin :-)
Regards, Dave.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
