Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Dave Cramer wrote:
On 31-Aug-06, at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, are you sure this is coming from JDBC? I see the exact same
message text in libpq:
libpq_gettext("server sent data (\"D\" message) without prior row
description (\"T\" message)\n"));
Maybe the JDBC driver uses the identical message wording but my
thought is to look for something going through libpq.
The error is server side. I was just describing the environment.
I can entirely assure you that that error message is not present in
the server code.
Well that's even more interesting because it doesn't exist in the
jdbc driver either.
Conclusion: they are using libpq in some form, so you should investigate
that.
Is there a way to alter the tick counter, so that a test run does not
need to take the full 3 weeks?
Sure it is a registry entry... so we could (in theory) shrink that quite
a bit.. However I am confused, if we don't use it, what that is
connecting to libpq would trigger it?
I know they are using pgAAdmin...
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
