Tom Lane wrote: > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't think that any of our SGML documentation is actually in UCS-4 > > encoding. > > The source files use nothing beyond plain ASCII (and should remain that > way, IMHO) so there isn't any need to inquire very far into exactly what > the toolchain thinks the "document encoding" is. The issue at hand here > is what the *output* character set is, which is to say the "document > character set" if I have the jargon right. That is the space over which > we are permitted to use &-entities.
Just for reference, if we could support UTF8, I was hoping to add non-Latin names as alternates to the ASCII versions, so we could have Japanese and Russian-lettered names in the release notes. I thought it would be a nice touch. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
