On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:59:36PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 03:05:36PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > >>Regardless, I think we should include a section of major new > >>projects/developments from pgFoundry, because they ultimately make > >>PostgreSQL a more useful database. Maybe this list should only be in the > > > >I like that. "New enhancement products" or something? "enhancement products" makes me think if Encyte and the like... :P Maybe "add-ons" would be better?
> In that case, what about things on gborg too? I just updated PL/R for > 8.2 compatibility (and finally changed the status from alpha to beta). > > BTW, I'm happy to move PL/R over to pgFoundry, but became a little > concerned about doing that after seeing the lengthy thread regarding > pgFoundry concerns (but admittedly, I didn't have time to read the > thread in detail, because I'm back over in Germany on a long business > trip again). I didn't mention gforge since it'd depricated, but I don't see an issue with listing any add-on projects, no matter where they're hosted. For example, didn't pgAdmin just add support for Slony? That's something worth mentioning. -- Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
