>> 'exists' isn't a good name for function :(. >> > > Yeah, that isn't going to work. Perhaps "ifexists"? Or just leave well > enough alone. > > > Darn. Can't have been thinking clearly this morning. How about "exist" (no s)?
Maybe 'found', 'present', or 'contains'? (no, I haven't checked for a grammar conflict)
-- Korry
