Jan Wieck wrote: > I don't have any such paper and the proof of concept will be the > implementation of the system. I do however see enough resistance against > this proposal to withdraw the commit timestamp at this time. The new > replication system will therefore require the installation of a patched, > non-standard PostgreSQL version, compiled from sources cluster wide in > order to be used. I am aware that this will dramatically reduce it's > popularity but it is impossible to develop this essential feature as an > external module. > > I thank everyone for their attention.
Going and working on it on your own doesn't seem like the proper solution. I don't see people objecting to adding it, but they want it work, which I am sure you want too. You have to show how it will work and convince others of that, and then you have a higher chance it will work, and be in the PostgreSQL codebase. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
