> What I'm more concerned about, with Jan's proposal, is the assumption > that you always want to resolve conflicts by time (except for > balances, > for which we don't have much information, yet). I'd rather
Um, I think the proposal was only for beneficial backend functionality for replication in general and time based conflict resolution. And "time based" is surely one of the important conflict resolution methods for async MM replication. Sure there are others, like "rule based" "priority based" but I think you don't need additional backend functionality for those. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
