Martijn van Oosterhout <[email protected]> writes:
> That's true, but I think it would be worthwhile to invert the switch to
> be --disable-thread-safety, since the number of people who don't
> understand the problem far outweigh the cost of the switch.
I'd vote against that unless it were done only for Linux, and personally
I think a platform-dependent default for this might be unreasonably
confusing.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
