Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:34:23AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: >>> That's true, but I think it would be worthwhile to invert the switch to >>> be --disable-thread-safety, since the number of people who don't >>> understand the problem far outweigh the cost of the switch. >> I'd vote against that unless it were done only for Linux, and personally >> I think a platform-dependent default for this might be unreasonably >> confusing. > > Well, it's already platform specific, Win32 removes the option > altogether (apparently). Which would be another option.
Visual C build only, not the MingW build. It still has the option. The win32 binary distribution sets it though. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
