Simon Riggs wrote: > > It occurs to me that if we had visibility in unique indexes, this would > > allow the index rows to be separately lockable to the main row. That's > > exactly what we need here. > > I've implemented a work-around using this principle, utilising RULEs and > a duplicated PK column-only table. This still allows FK checks to work > correctly, yet doesn't require the backend hack Csaba mentioned. > > My feeling is that more work in this area is required, even if we can't > yet agree a TODO item.
OK, please propose some wording so at least we can get agreement on that. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
