"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, please propose some wording so at least we can get agreement on > that.
How about something open-ended like "arrange for updates that do not update columns referenced by foreign keys from other tables to avoid being blocked by locks from concurrent RI checks" -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
