"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, for completeness, the causes I wrote off as not interesting > (anymore, in some cases): > > missing BYTE_ORDER definition for Solaris | > 2007-01-10 14:18:23 | 1
What is this BYTE_ORDER macro? Should I be using it instead of the AC_C_BIGENDIAN test in configure for the packed varlena patch? > row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test | > 2007-02-10 03:00:02 | 3 Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? If not shouldn't the test get an ORDER BY clause so that it will reliably pass on future versions? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
