> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would like to propose adding new character set "JIS X > > 0213"(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JIS_X_0213). > > ... > > Note that since encoding schema of EUC_JIS_2004 is exactly identical > > to EUC_JP, we can reuse existing encoding routines defined in > > utls/mb/*.c. > > I'm confused. If this is exactly the same as EUC_JP, why do we need > any new code at all? Why not just a documentation addition saying > they are the same thing? Or maybe rename EUC_JP to reflect the new > standard number (we've certainly renamed encodings before).
I said *encoding schema" is same, not the contents (character set) is same. In another word, characters included in EUC_JP are not same as EUC_JIS_2004. Also, EUC_JIS_2004 is *not* the super set of EUC_JP. So we need to let EUC_JP and EUC_JIS_2004 coexist. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match