Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I just realized that I need to check every usage of typtype to be > > sure that the enums patch is sane. So, barring objection, I intend > > to take this opportunity to make the code stop referring directly > > to 'b', 'c' etc whereever possible. Any objections to these names? > > > > #define TYPTYPE_BASE 'b' > > #define TYPTYPE_COMPOSITE 'c' > > #define TYPTYPE_DOMAIN 'd' > > #define TYPTYPE_ENUM 'e' > > #define TYPTYPE_PSEUDO 'p' > > I like macros. ;-)
Why not enums? ;-) -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
