Bruce Momjian wrote:
The bottom line is if you had a system that was 100% perfect in capturing all information about a patch, it only helps us 2% toward reviewing the patch, and what is the cost of keeping 100% information?
2% for you or Tom reviewing a recently discussed, run-of-the mill patch. I suspect that %age will rise as the patch complexity increases and the reviewers experience decreases - which is exactly the situation that it would help to improve.
Also note that I'm not saying I can produce a system that's 100% correct - just one that will capture the posts that keep the patch ID in their subject line *automatically* - meaning you don't have to worry about keeping threads for the existing queue or tracking the patch status.
Regards Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
