Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> This is even better than our archives due to the problem that the >> archives don't have links to messages crossing month boundaries. Have >> you noticed that if you go to the archives, some discussions appear >> truncated at a point, but you can go to the archive for the next month >> and it continues there? I find that artifact somewhat annoying. The >> bug report would continue receiving the CC'ed mails, so it would record >> them all in a single place.
> Not crossing month boundaries is super-annoying. Indeed, but that should be fixed. I can't imagine that one presumably-fixable deficiency is grounds for changing our entire discussion infrastructure. Or do you think we will find something else that has no deficiencies of its own? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org