On 5/16/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep, that is part of our problem, but even items people have already said they _can_ review have shown little progress.
For complex patches, it might help to identify and associate a core/senior community member in the early stages of design and development. This member will then have enough insight into the work as it progresses and can him/herself act as a committer and/or help the committer later. We developed HOT in a phased manner. Had each of the incremental patches been reviewed, I think the review process would have been much easier and less painful. Also that would have helped us to identify any obvious bugs/show stoppers early in the cycle and might have even generated better ideas to do things differently. Having said that, I fully understand the difficulties of the committers who need to put substantial efforts in understanding the patch and guage its overall impact. Thanks, Pavan -- EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
