Pavan Deolasee wrote: > On 5/17/07, Cui Shijun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I want to help the reviewing work of "ctid chain following enhancement ". > > I've been studying the souce code which related with that part recently. > > :-) > > > > Tom had objected to this patch on the grounds that it adds complexity > without any significant gains. Though I don't completely agree with the > first part, the second part is indeed debatable since the code is touched > only > for infrequently.
Right. The reason the patch was kept in the queue is that there was discussion that HOT will exercise that part of the code a lot more than it does currently. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
