Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, not unless you can make the case why this handles NaNs and
>> denormalized numbers compatibly across platforms...
>>
> NaNs and infinite (plus and minus) should not be a problem.
Really? Need I point out that these concepts, let alone their
representation, are not standardized in non-IEEE float implementations?
> I'm not sure what denormalized numbers are.
You should find out before proposing representation replacements for
floats.
> What is the scenario in which you would want to tell them apart?
> Likewise, would you really want to tell +0 and -0 apart?
There are competent authorities --- for instance, the guys who created
the IEEE float standard --- who think it's worth distinguishing them.
IIRC (it's been fifteen or so years since I did any serious numerical
analysis) the arguments in favor have mostly to do with preserving
maximal accuracy for intermediate results in a series of calculations.
So maybe you could claim that these arguments are not so relevant to
storage in a database. But personally I don't think it's the province
of a database to decide that it need not accurately preserve the data
it's given to store.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
