Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be useful to have a function which could be passed a relative
> (to the caller's search path) object name and would return the fully
> qualified name of that object. In this way, functions could be written
> which take relative arguments from the user but *only* those explicitly
> checked for.
Your example doesn't seem to be doing anything interesting ... am I
misunderstanding, or did you omit the actual checking? Also, if the
search path is controlled by the function, what good is this ---
wouldn't it always result in a trusted schema?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
