On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording > should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still > some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg > test scaffolding. For instance, dragonfly claims a green build, but > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dragonfly&dt=2007-06-04%20043001&stg=ecpg-check > shows this interesting trace: > ... > testing connect/test2.pgc ... ./pg_regress: bad > substitution
Is it possible to find out which line is reporting this error? Looks to me like some incompatibility on the shell side. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
