Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Zdenek Kotala wrote: >> I don't see any "const" keyword there.
> Right after that: >> where int conv(int num_msg, const struct pam_message **msg, struct >> pam_response **resp, void *appdata_ptr); > How confusing... And the pam_start page he cited earlier has a different set of typos in its version of the struct :-(. Still, that's two out of three places that say it's const, and Solaris appears to be the only implementation that has chosen to read it as not const. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster