Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 15:25 schrieb Stefan Kaltenbrunner: >>>> a lot of those are simply noise (like the LOOP VECTORIZED stuff from >>>> the >>>> icc boxes or the "statement not reached" spam from the sun compilers) >>>> but others might indicate real issues. >>>> To find warnings that might be a real problem we might want to look >>>> into >>>> suppressing those - if possible - using compiler switches. >>> It would be good to determine an appropriate set of compiler switches >>> to reduce the warnings to a reasonable level. >> >> yeah once we have determined that this whole experiment is useful it >> should be pretty easy to tweak the compiler switches for the non-gcc >> compilers (mostly icc and sun studio seem to be the ones that generate >> excessive output). >> > > For sun studio -erroff=E_STATEMENT_NOT_REACHED is useful there. If you > want to determine warning tags for each warning add -errtags.
Is that supported on all versions of sun studio(Sun WorkShop 6, Sun Studio 8,11) we have on the farm ? Stefan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly