Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Not for Wordpad though, and it's pretty universal too. And Notepad > won't load a file of any great size anyway. Furthermore, we just can't > have this alongside the pipe chunking protocol, so I'm inclined to > blow it away altogether, unless there are pretty loud squawks. > Especially for machine-readable logs, we want the log file to get > *exactly* what we send it. Well I'd LOVE reliably machine-readable logs, but I think that will collide with human-readability.
Regards Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
