-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Bertram Scharpf wrote: >>> Wouldn't the release be a good opportunity for providing >>> this little tool?
> As for whether we could accept this for 8.4, I thought the general > consensus was that we should implement the SQL-spec WITH syntax. > The only good reason for supporting CONNECT BY would be to be > Oracle-compatible, which this patch isn't. (Being Oracle-compatible > isn't necessarily good anyway; are we sure they don't have a patent > on their way of doing this?) I believe this patch is an update to the table_funcs contrib module. Sincerely, Joshua D Drake > > Various people have looked at supporting WITH in the past; IIRC Greg > Stark has been the most recent contender. I'd suggest joining forces > with him if you'd like to make this happen. > > regards, tom lane > - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGvbFuATb/zqfZUUQRAiwTAJ45uppSOwSbk/d0KTENmjkMk6GK0wCgk0Tf kirMXmEOH9fYSYt+CG9UMIM= =D9x7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org