-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joe Conway wrote: > Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Bertram Scharpf wrote: >>>>> Wouldn't the release be a good opportunity for providing >>>>> this little tool? >> >>> As for whether we could accept this for 8.4, I thought the general >>> consensus was that we should implement the SQL-spec WITH syntax. >>> The only good reason for supporting CONNECT BY would be to be >>> Oracle-compatible, which this patch isn't. (Being Oracle-compatible >>> isn't necessarily good anyway; are we sure they don't have a patent >>> on their way of doing this?) >> >> I believe this patch is an update to the table_funcs contrib module. > > I guess I should weigh in here. I have to agree with Tom, namely that: > > 1. It is way to late for a massive change to the existing contrib for > Postgres 8.3
I am not in anyway promoting this for inclusion in 8.3. Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGvdVlATb/zqfZUUQRAmF9AJ99WTbAD4ALyEhajSWVtD62FJ6ieQCfT49s F8UBcgGen6Pl6M9cmVG29UI= =ZV14 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org