Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Neil Conway wrote:
>> I don't mean to hijack your thread, but I wonder if maintaining two >> separate build systems is the best approach in the long term. I think >> CMake[1] is an interesting alternative: it would allow us to generate >> both makefiles and MSVC .proj's from a single set of master build files. > > I would be more than happy if we had a single build system. Maybe some > enterprising person would like to try to create such a system as a proof of > concept. I count around 200 makefiles in our sources ;-) > > Of course, we'd need to know that cmake was pretty universally available > too. That, or we create the makefiles in a fixed system and keep the Makefiles in CVS (though would be derived files). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
