Simon Riggs wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 18:35 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > I think this project has got too big for us to make things up as we go > > along. We need to follow processes that are well understood and > > transparent. > > Well said, I very much agree. > > Mostly we do, but since we've just spent more than 6 months between > Feature Freeze and Beta. There were no well understood or transparent > processes during that period, so nobody is on solid ground trying to > enforce a small number of rules with a single individual. Especially > when discussing what might be argued was a major item in 8.3
What? Even Jan agrees he didn't follow the procedures. I have no idea how you are coming to the conclusion there are no well understood processes. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
