On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There was a very similar proposal a little while back (google: > > array_to_set). I think I like those names better since you are > > returning a set, not an iterator :-). > > I agree, this is a very poor choice of name. There should be some > reference to arrays in it, for one thing. > > generate_array_subscripts() maybe?
array_to_set or array_expand seem a little better imo (shorter, and symmetry with array_accum()), unless you want to differentiate between internal funcs (array_cat and the like) vs. user funcs. I would prefer a proper C implementation to a solution based around generate_series(). I'm doing a lot of C funcs lately and would be happy taking a stab at this... merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
