On 10/18/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't much like either of those, because they seem misleading: > what I'd expect from a function named that way is that it returns > the *elements* of the array, not their subscripts. > > Come to think of it, do we have a way of doing that directly? If you > only care about accessing the array elements, it seems like dealing in > the subscripts is just notational tedium. Perhaps there should be > array_expand(anyarray) returns setof anyelement, in addition to the > subscript generation function. > > On the question of being too long, I could live with > generate_subscripts().
how about array_iota? merlin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
