Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

[Larry Rosenman]

--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.

Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared
to getting them to *remove* the one for i386.  And while I think
they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be
solved as soon as they add the former.

sure, and I expect that's what they may do. We'll see what they say.

LER

regards, tom lane

--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature