Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

[Larry Rosenman]

--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it ****BREAKS**** UnixWare (If
y'all= =20
care).

Unfixably? Or just a small oversight?

I'm actually not worried about platforms that are actively being tested.
It's the stuff that hasn't been confirmed recently that is going to be
at risk.

I'm seeing failures with the 2nd patch as well. Seems like it's not liking UnixWare's
cc defines.

the documentation is at:

http://www.lerctr.org:8458/

the cc man page is at:

http://www.lerctr.org:8458/en/man/html.1/cc.1.html

Tom, You still have an account here.

Bruce, if you'd like an account, that is easily arranged.

LER

regards, tom lane

--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature