"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a matter of style, it's been a while since I've seriously considered cross
> platform C. Is it the done thing to expect:
> int *i = (int *)calloc(1,sizeof(int));
> to give the condition *i == 0 (assuming the memory allocation worked)?
calloc is defined to zero out the block of memory it returns (as opposed
to malloc which may return a block containing any random junk).
A more serious question is whether any of this code should be using
calloc/malloc as opposed to palloc. I'd prefer to see it rewritten to
use palloc wherever possible; but that begs the question of what the
required lifespan of the allocations is.
+ #ifndef NULL
+ #define NULL ((void *)0)
+ #endif
It has been roughly twenty years since a C platform existed that didn't
predefine NULL ... and the ones that did not would likely not recognize
the ANSI-C-ism "void *". So the above is unhelpful by any measure.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
