Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 27 May 2005 15:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I didn't find any. Nevertheless, while there are undoubtedly some uses >> for everything, making this the default behavior does not seem >> acceptable.
> ISTM it is more acceptable than you're willing to admit. > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00009.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00102.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00199.php As near as I can tell, opinion is divided about fifty-fifty among those who have bothered to weigh in ... which is hardly a strong case for making an enforced change in long-standing behavior (since those who want a change have more of an incentive to say so than those who don't). A customization variable is definitely sounding like the way to go if we're going to do anything here. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
