Matt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 17:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I dislike the choice of "EXACT", too, as it (a) adds a new reserved word
>> and (b) doesn't seem to convey quite what is happening anyway. Not sure
>> about a better word though ... anyone?
> I can attach a patch that supports [EXACT | NOEXACT].
Somehow, proposing two new reserved words instead of one doesn't seem
very responsive to my gripe :-(.
If you think that this should be a global option instead of a
per-statement one, something like the (undocumented) #option hack might
be a good way to specify it; that would give it per-function scope,
which seems reasonable.
create function myfn(...) returns ... as $$
#option select_into_1_row
declare ...
$$ language plpgsql;
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
