Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define > >>and ifdef blocks before applying. > > > >BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's > >nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk. > >Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is > >"merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring. > > MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...
Dual cid? Double cid? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq