Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to clean this up by creating a > separate typedef for segment numbers, with its own special values?
Probably. I remember having thought about it when I put in the FORGET_DATABASE_FSYNC hack. I think I didn't do it because I needed to backpatch and so I wanted a minimal-size patch. Feel free to do it in HEAD ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly