Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if it wouldn't be better to clean this up by creating a
> separate typedef for segment numbers, with its own special values?
Probably. I remember having thought about it when I put in the
FORGET_DATABASE_FSYNC hack. I think I didn't do it because I needed
to backpatch and so I wanted a minimal-size patch. Feel free to do it
in HEAD ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
