Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. I've preivously been told not to use "Failed to" but instead use
> "Could not"... Didn't notice that Tom used the other one in his
> suggestion.
> Tom (or someone else) - can you comment on if I misunderstood that
> recommendation earlier, or if it still holds?
Oh, yes, "could not" is better. My mistake.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
