On Apr 21, 2005, at 7:49 AM, Shoaib Burq (VPAC) wrote:
You should really, really bump up shared_buffers and given you have 8GB of ram this query would likely benefit from more work_mem.Now I have not touch the $PGDATA/postgresql.conf (As I know very little about memory tuning) Have run VACCUM & ANALYZE.
and the time taken is *twice* that for the original. The modification wasIs this an IO intensive query? If running both in parellel results in 2x the run time and you have sufficient cpus it would (to me) indicate you don't have enough IO bandwidth to satisfy the query.
minor. The queries do make use of both CPUs:
Can we see an explain analyze of the query? Could be a bad plan and a bad plan will never give good performance.
-- Jeff Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org