Rod Taylor wrote:
Just a minor clarification here: INSERT does not create dead rows, only
UPDATE and DELETE do. Thus, if you only insert rows, you do not need to
vacuum (although you probably need to analyze).
Is there no real-time garbage collection at all in Postgres? And if so, is
this because nobody has had time to implement garbage collection, or for a more
fundamental reason, or because VACUUM is seen as sufficient?
I'm just curious ... Vacuum has always seemed to me like an ugly wart on the pretty face of Postgres. (I say this even though I implemented an identical solution on a non-relational chemistry database system a long time ago. I didn't like it then, either.)
Craig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
